DIZON.LAW

Insights

On AI in the practice of law.

Essays on the institutions, professional duties, and public systems being reshaped by artificial intelligence. Written from inside legal practice, and alongside the work of building the tools.

  1. 9 min readEthics

    What ABA Formal Opinion 512 Requires of Lawyers Using AI

    The ABA's first formal ethics opinion on generative AI says the rules you already follow govern your use of these tools, and they govern it now.

    Read
  2. 9 min readSanctions

    AI-Fabricated Citation Cases Every Litigator Should Know

    Five named cases, one repeated failure, and the written protocol that keeps your firm off the list.

    Read
  3. 8 min readAI ethics

    Is ChatGPT Confidential for Lawyers? It Depends on the Account, Not the Model

    The confidentiality of an AI chatbot rarely turns on the model; it turns on whether your firm signed consumer terms or a commercial contract.

    Read
  4. 9 min readlegal ethics

    State Bar AI Ethics Guidance: What the Rules Actually Require

    Generative AI did not create new ethical duties; it stress-tested the ones lawyers already had, and the states are converging on the same five answers.

    Read
  5. 8 min readEthics

    How to Write a Law Firm AI-Use Policy: A Practical Guide

    What a one-to-two page firm AI-use policy should contain, grounded in ABA Formal Opinion 512 and the duties of competence, confidentiality, and supervision.

    Read
  6. 8 min readlegal ethics

    Rule 1.1 Comment 8 and AI: The Technological Competence Duty Every Firm Now Faces

    The duty of technological competence is no longer an aspiration. With generative AI in daily practice, it is a concrete operating standard.

    Read
  7. 9 min readFees

    Billing for AI Under Rule 1.5: What Reasonable-Fee Rules Allow

    When AI cuts the hours a task takes, the reasonable-fee rules still govern; here is what the ABA, North Carolina, and Virginia say you may charge.

    Read
  8. 9 min readEthics

    Supervising AI: A Partner's Duty Under Rules 5.1 and 5.3

    When an associate files a brief built on a fabricated citation, the supervising lawyer's name is on the line too, and the rules say so.

    Read
  9. 9 min readlegal AI

    AI Legal Research Tools Are Useful and Unreliable: What the Stanford Studies and ABA Opinion 512 Require

    Two Stanford studies put numbers on legal AI error rates, and the sanctions cases and ABA Formal Opinion 512 make verification a professional duty, not an option.

    Read
  10. 10 min readTools

    Legal AI Tools for Small and Mid-Sized Firms: A Grounded Survey

    The four categories of legal AI tools a 3-to-30-attorney firm should know, the real products in each, and the professional duties that attach the moment any of them touches a client matter.

    Read
  11. 9 min readLitigation

    AI Standing Orders in Court: What Filers Must Now Certify

    A growing number of judges require a written certification about generative AI use and human review before they will accept your filing, and the obligation behind it is one lawyers already owe.

    Read
  12. 9 min readlegal ethics

    AI, Chatbots, and Rule 5.5: Where Law Firms Cross the Unauthorized-Practice Line

    A client-facing chatbot and an over-trusted AI draft create exposure in two directions, and both trace back to a small set of plain, older rules.

    Read
  13. 9 min readEthics

    Should You Tell Clients You Use AI? What Rule 1.4 and ABA Opinion 512 Actually Require

    No ethics opinion requires blanket disclosure of all AI use, so the real task is knowing the few situations where consent is mandatory and handling them at intake.

    Read
  14. 9 min readEthics

    Florida Bar Opinion 24-1 on Generative AI, Explained for Small Firms

    A focused walkthrough of how Florida Ethics Opinion 24-1 applies confidentiality, oversight, fee, and advertising duties to lawyers using generative AI.

    Read
  15. 9 min readEthics

    Texas Opinion 705 on Generative AI, Explained for Small Firms

    A focused guide to what the State Bar of Texas told its lawyers about using generative AI, and what it means for firms of three to thirty attorneys.

    Read
  16. 9 min readSanctions

    Wadsworth v. Walmart: Why an In-House AI Tool Is Not a Defense

    A large firm with its own proprietary research platform still filed eight fabricated cases, which tells you the safeguard was never the tool.

    Read
  17. 9 min readTools

    Why grounded (RAG) legal AI hallucinates less, and why you still verify

    A system that answers from a defined set of documents hallucinates less than a raw chatbot, but a lower error rate is still an error rate, and the duty to verify does not change.

    Read
  18. 9 min readTools

    Build vs. Buy Legal AI: When a Small Firm Should Build Its Own

    Buy the mature commercial tools for research and contract review, and build only where your firm holds a defensible private asset no vendor can sell.

    Read
  19. 10 min readConfidentiality

    AI in an Immigration Practice: Where It Helps and Where It Bites

    AI can compress the repetitive spine of high-volume immigration work, but sensitive client data and unverified output set hard limits on where it belongs.

    Read
  20. 9 min readConfidentiality

    AI for Trusts and Estates: Document Assembly Done Right

    Trusts and estates work runs on repeated language, which makes it a natural fit for AI, provided the model is grounded in your templates and checked by a lawyer.

    Read